Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1428988
 
 

Footnotes (94)



 


 



Cross-Examination: Seemingly Ubiquitous, Purportedly Omnipotent, and 'At Risk'


Jules Epstein


Widener University - School of Law

July 2, 2009

Widener Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2009
Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-29

Abstract:     
Cross-examination is viewed as a core aspect of the trial process, both criminal and civil, and its use and purported power are omnipresent in the American adjudicative system. Indeed, this role is confirmed in the abundance of literature (both fictional and educational) involving cross-examination, and its increasing prominence in the law school curriculum.

This article confirms the exalted status cross-examination has achieved and arguably retains in the American trial and fact-finding process, while simultaneously identifying its frailties: its ineffectiveness as a truth-discerning tool in varying contexts; trends in constitutional law that will eliminate the requirement of cross-examination for expanding categories of witnesses; and the impact of technology and popular media on the learning processes and expectations of jurors. Particularly because of the transformation of hearsay law and the continuing trend toward visual rather than aural learning and knowledge accumulation, cross-examination may play a reduced role in the trial process and its form may need to be reinvented.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: cross-examination, trial practice, evidence

JEL Classification: K4, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 3, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Epstein, Jules, Cross-Examination: Seemingly Ubiquitous, Purportedly Omnipotent, and 'At Risk' (July 2, 2009). Widener Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2009; Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1428988

Contact Information

Jules Epstein (Contact Author)
Widener University - School of Law ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
P.O. Box 7286
Wilmington, DE 19803-0474
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 868
Downloads: 146
Download Rank: 112,697
Footnotes:  94

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds