The Crisis that Was Not There: Notes on a Reply
affiliation not provided to SSRN
International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. 515-528, 2009
In this response to Lorenzo Zucca's critique (… A reply to Professor Sajó) of his 2008 article, Preliminaries to a Concept of Constitutional Secularism, Professor Sajó pronounces himself grateful for the opportunity to examine specific examples of the rationales being advanced in order to “create a space for special practices that do not conform to constitutional values.” At the end of the day, he remains persuaded of the dangers of including religious phraseology and concepts in law that would give “too much aid and comfort” to already privileged religious organizations, in the name of free exercise of religion.
Date posted: July 4, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.406 seconds