Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1430206
 


 



Is a Burrito a Sandwich? Exploring Race, Class and Culture in Contracts


Marjorie Florestal


University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law

September 1, 2008

Michigan Journal of Race and Law, Vol. 14, Issue 1, Fall 2008

Abstract:     
A superior court in Worcester, Massachusetts, recently determined that a burrito is not a sandwich. Surprisingly, the decision sparked a firestorm of media attention. Worcester, Massachusetts, is hardly the pinnacle of the culinary arts - so why all the interest in the musings of one lone judge on the nature of burritos and sandwiches? Closer inspection revealed the allure of this otherwise peculiar case: Potentially thousands of dollars turned on the interpretation of a single word in a single clause of a commercial contract. Judge Locke based his decision on 'common sense' and a single definition of sandwich - 'two thin pieces of bread, usually buttered, with a thin layer (as of meat, cheese, or savory mixture) spread between them.' The only barrier to the burrito's entry into the sacred realm of sandwiches is an additional piece of bread? What about the one-slice, open-face sandwich? Or the club sandwich, typically served as a double-decker with three pieces of bread? What about wraps? The court's definition lacked subtlety, complexity or nuance; it was rigid, not allowing for the possibility of change and evolution. It was a decision couched in the 'primitive formalism' Judge Cardozo derided nearly ninety years ago when he said '[t]he law has outgrown its primitive stage of formalism when the precise word was a sovereign talisman, and every slip was fatal. It takes a broader view today.' Does it? Despite the title of this piece, my goal is not to determine with any legal, scientific or culinary specificity whether a burrito is a sandwich. Rather, I explore what lies beneath the 'primitive formalism' or somewhat smug determination of the court that common sense answers the question for us. I suggest Judge Locke's gut-level understanding that burritos are not sandwiches actually masks an unconscious bias. I explore this bias by examining the determination of this case and the impact of race, class and culture on contract principles.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: contracts, interpretation, race, class, culture

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 7, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Florestal, Marjorie, Is a Burrito a Sandwich? Exploring Race, Class and Culture in Contracts (September 1, 2008). Michigan Journal of Race and Law, Vol. 14, Issue 1, Fall 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1430206

Contact Information

Marjorie Florestal (Contact Author)
University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law ( email )
3200 Fifth Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95817
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,578
Downloads: 148
Download Rank: 111,322

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds