Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1431230
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (70)



 


 



Empathetic Judging and the Rule of Law


Susan A. Bandes


DePaul University - College of Law


Cardozo Law Review De Novo, p. 133, 2009

Abstract:     
This short essay addresses the contention that empathy in judging is inconsistent with the rule of law. It first argues that empathy, defined as the ability to take the perspective of another, is an essential judicial attribute. Some of those who argue against empathy are in fact taking issue with the notion of sympathy for particular litigants or classes of litigants. Empathy aids a judge in grasping the stakes for all the litigants. However, it does not help resolve whose claims should prevail. The essay then explores the more difficult question that follows: if empathy for all litigants is desirable, does President Obama’s expressed desire to appoint judges with “the empathy to recognize what it’s like to be a young teenage mom” and empathy for other historically disadvantaged groups conflict with rule of law values? Obama’s remarks can be interpreted as a direct challenge to a particular conception of the rule of law - the notion of the judge as umpire who approaches legal issues with no preconceptions. As the “pop quiz” that begins the article illustrates, judges routinely exercise empathy for particular groups, finding some perspectives more accessible than others. This sort of selective empathy can be ameliorated, to an extent, by judges who are aware of their own blind spots and the limits of individual perspective. More effectively, it can be addressed by aiming for a Court with a range of backgrounds and life experiences. Supreme Court justices, like the rest of us, make better decisions in an atmosphere of lively debate than in an echo chamber.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: empathy, judicial decison-making, judges, courts

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 9, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Bandes, Susan A., Empathetic Judging and the Rule of Law. Cardozo Law Review De Novo, p. 133, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1431230

Contact Information

Susan A. Bandes (Contact Author)
DePaul University - College of Law ( email )
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL Cook County 60604-2287
United States
(312) 362-8452 (Phone)
(312) 362-5448 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,386
Downloads: 260
Download Rank: 66,167
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  70
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds