Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1431705
 
 

Footnotes (126)



 


 



The Majority Will: A Case Study of Misinformation, Manipulation, and the Oregon Initiative Process


Paula L. Abrams


Lewis & Clark Law School

2009

Oregon Law Review, Forthcoming
Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-15

Abstract:     
The controversy over the use of the initiative process to enact social policy began in the progressive era and remains heated today. Direct legislation eliminates the deliberative process of legislative and executive review, circumventing the checks and balances that define representative democracy. The absence of these checks and balances poses a high risk that voters will act on the basis of inaccurate or biased information. Appeals to voter prejudice can be a particularly potent and harmful strategy to agitate the majority against minority groups.

This article examines deception and discrimination in the initiative process by presenting a case study of one of the earliest and controversial initiatives, the Oregon School Bill. The School Bill mandated public education for all children, effectively destroying private, particularly Catholic, education. The challenge to Oregon’s compulsory public education law yielded a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, Pierce v. Society of Sisters. This article offers case-specific insight into how voters can be manipulated by misinformation and prejudice. It explores the tension between representative democracy and direct legislation, particularly how the initiative undermines the deliberative process. The article analyzes how voter ignorance, fear, and prejudice toward minority groups may taint the initiative process. Finally, the article examines legal solutions and recommends that the courts closely scrutinize direct legislation that harms historically disadvantaged groups.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Initiative, direct legislation, direct democracy, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, Guarantee Clause, representative democracy, compulsory public education, voter prejudice, constitutional law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 12, 2009 ; Last revised: September 14, 2009

Suggested Citation

Abrams, Paula L., The Majority Will: A Case Study of Misinformation, Manipulation, and the Oregon Initiative Process (2009). Oregon Law Review, Forthcoming; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1431705

Contact Information

Paula L. Abrams (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
503-768-6632 (Phone)
503-768-6716 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 564
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 200,888
Footnotes:  126

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds