Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432033
 


 



Some Observations and Suggestions Concerning a Misnomer - 'Protected Concerted Activities


George Schatzki


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

1969

Texas Law Review, Vol. 47, p. 378, 1969

Abstract:     
Professor Schatzki observes that the National Labor Relations Board and the courts have not adequately protected the rights of individual employees to engage in section 7 concerted activities. He suggests that the National Labor Relations Act should be interpreted to allow employees to participate in 'partial strikes' without being, in the Board's terms, 'permanently replaced.' Indeed, Professor Schatzki argues, employees should never be terminated for engaging in concerted activities unless they know or should know that their conduct is illegal.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: National Labor Relations Board, employees, concerted activities

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 9, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Schatzki, George, Some Observations and Suggestions Concerning a Misnomer - 'Protected Concerted Activities (1969). Texas Law Review, Vol. 47, p. 378, 1969. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432033

Contact Information

George Schatzki (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 304
Downloads: 8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds