Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432146
 


 



Preemption of Bivens {Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 91 S. Ct. 1999 (1971)} Claims: How Clearly Must Congress Speak?


Betsy Grey


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

1992

Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol 70, p. 1087, 1992

Abstract:     
The thesis of this Article is that "automatic preemption" is inconsistent with both (1) other lines of cases in which the Court ordinarily has declined to find a congressional intent to diminish protection of individual rights and liberties; and (2) the federal-state preemption doctrine that determines whether Congress has intended to displace state common law remedies. Part I of this Article demonstrates that the Court's approach to congressional remedial schemes has changed significantly since Bivens. The early cases emphasized compensating victims of constitutional violations and adopted a presumption in favor of implied remedies, whereas the later cases stressed deference to Congress and adopted a presumption against implied remedies. Part II of the Article investigates whether this change in approach is warranted by the principle that, when filling gaps in federal legislation (i.e., creating federal common law), the Court should exercise caution because it is acting in an area primarily entrusted to Congress. The Article concludes that even assuming Bivens remedies are a creature of federal common law, the Court's role in fashioning Bivens remedies cannot be analogized to the mere gap-filling role that the Court typically plays in federal common law areas that do not involve constitutional rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Compensation, remedies, automatic preemption

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 10, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Grey, Betsy, Preemption of Bivens {Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 91 S. Ct. 1999 (1971)} Claims: How Clearly Must Congress Speak? (1992). Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol 70, p. 1087, 1992. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432146

Contact Information

Betsy Grey (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 577
Downloads: 17

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds