Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432318
 


 



Law Upside Down: A Critical Essay on Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.


Franklin A. Gevurtz


University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law


Northwestern Univ. Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 448, 2009
Pacific McGeorge School of Law Research Paper No. 10-05

Abstract:     
This essay uses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the highly controversial Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific Atlanta, Inc. case to explore the question of who ought to pay when corporations issue false financial statements - an issue of critical importance with the seemingly endless stream of corporate fraud coming to light. The Supreme’s Courts’ answer is to focus on the corporation as the target for liability. The thrust of the essay is to show how this paints a bulls-eye on the wrong target, while allowing those who profited from knowing misrepresentation to escape liability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Securities fraud

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 12, 2009 ; Last revised: August 13, 2010

Suggested Citation

Gevurtz, Franklin A., Law Upside Down: A Critical Essay on Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.. Northwestern Univ. Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 448, 2009; Pacific McGeorge School of Law Research Paper No. 10-05. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432318

Contact Information

Franklin A. Gevurtz (Contact Author)
University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law ( email )
3200 Fifth Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95817
United States
916-739-7111 (Phone)
916-739-7105 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 669
Downloads: 132
Download Rank: 127,113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.265 seconds