A Common Lawyer’s Perspective on the European Perspective on Punitive Damages
Michael Lewis Wells
University of Georgia Law School
July 1, 2009
University of Georgia School of Law Legal Studies Research No. 09-11
Louisiana Law Review, Forthcoming
Punitive damages are generally available in common law jurisdictions, but are disfavored in civil law systems. This paper argues that the main reasons for the difference are historical and cultural. Roman law and the French Revolution heaviliy influenced the civil law. Civilians were taught that legal development comes from the top down. They learned to treat law as a system of general principles and to resist anomalies. They found it relatively easy to reject the intrusion of criminal themes into private law. The common law developed one case at a time, with no particular emphasis on systematic coherence. It was comparatively easy for lawyers to convince judges that juries in tort cases should be allowed to punish defendants for egregious misconduct.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: Punitive damages, common vs. civil law, comparative legal history
JEL Classification: K13Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 10, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds