Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432574
 
 

Footnotes (103)



 


 



A Common Lawyer’s Perspective on the European Perspective on Punitive Damages


Michael Lewis Wells


University of Georgia Law School

July 1, 2009

University of Georgia School of Law Legal Studies Research No. 09-11
Louisiana Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Punitive damages are generally available in common law jurisdictions, but are disfavored in civil law systems. This paper argues that the main reasons for the difference are historical and cultural. Roman law and the French Revolution heaviliy influenced the civil law. Civilians were taught that legal development comes from the top down. They learned to treat law as a system of general principles and to resist anomalies. They found it relatively easy to reject the intrusion of criminal themes into private law. The common law developed one case at a time, with no particular emphasis on systematic coherence. It was comparatively easy for lawyers to convince judges that juries in tort cases should be allowed to punish defendants for egregious misconduct.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Punitive damages, common vs. civil law, comparative legal history

JEL Classification: K13

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 10, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Wells, Michael Lewis, A Common Lawyer’s Perspective on the European Perspective on Punitive Damages (July 1, 2009). University of Georgia School of Law Legal Studies Research No. 09-11; Louisiana Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1432574

Contact Information

Michael Lewis Wells (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,564
Downloads: 191
Download Rank: 88,382
Footnotes:  103

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds