Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1433123
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Are Juries Necessary? The Role of Juries in Defamation Trials


David Rolph


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law


Precedent, No. 92, pp. 10-14, 2009
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/66

Abstract:     
In the last decade in New South Wales, there have been a number of challenges to 'unreasonable' jury verdicts. As a consequence, the role of juries in defamation trials has recently been questioned in some quarters. This paper argues that juries themselves are not the problem. Given the centrality of the 'ordinary, reasonable reader' to defamation law, juries, embodying the 'ordinary, reasonable reader', play an important role, representing community values and understanding in defamation litigation. Rather, the complex principles and procedures which have developed around defamation law are the real problem. The solution is not the abolition of juries but the reform of defamation law and practice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: defamation, media law, juries, trials, 'ordinary, reasonable reader', Australia,New South Wales, law reform

JEL Classification: K10. K13, K30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 13, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Rolph, David, Are Juries Necessary? The Role of Juries in Defamation Trials. Precedent, No. 92, pp. 10-14, 2009; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 09/66. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1433123

Contact Information

David Rolph (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,127
Downloads: 243
Download Rank: 72,196
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds