Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1433839
 


 



Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes: Betraying Freedom of Political Expression and Undermining Democracy


Jamin Ben Raskin


American University Washington College of Law

2008

WE DISSENT: TALKING BACK TO THE RHENQUIST COURT: EIGHT CASES THAT SUBVERTED CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS, Michael Avery, ed., 2008

Abstract:     
In Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes (1998), the Supreme Court upheld the exclusion of an Independent congressional candidate from a televised debate organized by Arkansas’s taxpayer-funded public television network. By a vote of six to three, the majority reversed the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and affirmed the state’s power to sponsor the general election debate closed to all but the Democratic and Republican candidates. To resolve the case, the Court grappled with two key questions. The first was whether the debate on a state-controlled station constituted a 'public forum' for First Amendment purposes, and, second, whether the exclusion of Ralph Forbes from the debate constituted 'viewpoint discrimination.' The Court determined that the debate was a 'nonpublic' forum. The majority also saw no viewpoint discrimination in Forbes’s exclusion. Justice Kennedy, who authored the majority opinion, was principally moved by the trial jury’s finding that Forbes was rejected as a participant by the debate managers not because they disliked his politics but because they correctly deemed his candidacy to be 'not viable.' Thus, the AETC’s exclusion of Forbes was not political viewpoint discrimination but a 'reasonable, viewpoint neutral exercise of its journalistic discretion.' In his dissent, Jamin Raskin concludes that the Court decided both of these questions erroneously and that the Court should have found that Arkansas was required to permit Forbes, a balloted candidate who had nearly become lieutenant governor in the prior election, to participate in the debate.

Keywords: First Amendment, public forum, political debates

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: August 22, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Raskin, Jamin Ben, Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes: Betraying Freedom of Political Expression and Undermining Democracy (2008). WE DISSENT: TALKING BACK TO THE RHENQUIST COURT: EIGHT CASES THAT SUBVERTED CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS, Michael Avery, ed., 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1433839

Contact Information

Jamin Ben Raskin (Contact Author)
American University Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 210

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.219 seconds