|
||||
|
||||
Opting in or Opting Out: The Conditions for Developing ConsensusCheryl BoudreauUniversity of California, Davis Mathew D. McCubbinsUniversity of Southern California - Marshall School of Business, Gould School of Law and the Department of Political Science Daniel B. RodriguezNorthwestern University - School of Law Nicholas WellerUniversity of Southern California - Department of Political Science; University of Southern California - School of International Relations November 13, 2009 CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper Abstract: In legal, political, and social settings, people must reach a consensus before particular outcomes can be achieved and failing to reach a consensus may be costly. Although many scholars identify conditions that make consensus more or less likely, they typically ignore key features of communication that may affect a group’s ability to reach a consensus. In this paper, we conduct experiments that take into account the costs associated with communicating, as well as the difficulty of the decisions that groups make. We find that when there is even a small cost (relative to the potential benefit) associated with speaking and/or listening, groups are much less likely to reach a consensus, primarily because they are less willing to communicate with one another. We also find that difficult problems significantly reduce group members’ willingness to communicate with one another and, therefore, hinder their ability to reach a consensus.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Keywords: consensus, experiments, political communication working papers seriesDate posted: July 16, 2009 ; Last revised: February 15, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds