|
||||
|
||||
An Evidence-Based Approach to Exclusive Dealing and Loyalty Discounts
Joshua D. Wright George Mason University School of Law Global Competition Policy, No. 1, July 2009 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-32 Abstract: At the recent Section 2 hearings focused on the antitrust analysis of exclusive dealing contracts, a sensible consensus view emerged that a necessary condition for anticompetitive harm in an exclusive dealing or de facto exclusive contract is that the contract deprives rivals of the opportunity to compete. These contracts, including market-share discounts and “loyalty discounts,” can harm competition when they deprive rivals of an entrenched firm from accessing distribution sufficient to achieve a minimum efficient scale. The recently-withdrawn Section 2 Report reflects this consensus. This article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the Section 2 Report approach to exclusive dealing and loyalty discounts.
Keywords: antitrust, consumer, David Evans, entrant, entry, exclusion, free ride, Heide, monopolist, predation, retailers JEL Classifications: K21, L41, L42, L44 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 18, 2009 ; Last revised: July 18, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.