Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1434985
 
 

Footnotes (5)



 


 



The Price of Abuse: Intel and the European Commission Decision


Robert H. Lande


University of Baltimore - School of Law

June 1, 2009

GCP: The Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy, No. 2, June 2009

Abstract:     
The May 13, 2009 decision by the European Commission ('EC') holding that Intel violated Article 82 of the Treaty of Rome and should be fined a record amount and prohibited from engaging in certain conduct, set off a predictable four part chorus of denunciations: 1. Intel did nothing wrong and was just competing hard; 2. Intel’s discounts were good for consumers; 3. The entire matter is just another example of Europeans protecting their own against a more efficient U. S. company; and 4. Even if Intel did engage in anticompetitive activity, the fine was much too large. These assertions will be addressed in turn.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: antitrust, Intel, European Commission, competition policy, EU, anticompetitive, Treaty of Rome, fines, American Antitrust Institute

JEL Classification: K21, K33, L40

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Lande, Robert H., The Price of Abuse: Intel and the European Commission Decision (June 1, 2009). GCP: The Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy, No. 2, June 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1434985 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434985

Contact Information

Robert H. Lande (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 852
Downloads: 275
Download Rank: 62,116
Footnotes:  5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.469 seconds