Diversification in Funds of Hedge Funds: Is it Possible to Overdiversify?
Stephen J. Brown
New York University - Stern School of Business
Greg N. Gregoriou
SUNY College at Plattsburgh; McGill University
Razvan C. Pascalau
SUNY College at Plattsburgh - School of Business and Economics
July 7, 2011
Samuelson (1967) argues that as a general matter it is easy to show that investors should be maximally diversified. For this reason many institutions are attracted to diversified portfolios of hedge funds, referred to as Funds of Hedge Funds (FOFs). In this paper we examine a new database that separates out for the first time the effects of diversification (the number of underlying hedge funds) from scale (the magnitude of assets under management). We find with others that the variance reducing effects of diversification peter out once FOFs hold more than 20 underlying hedge funds. Yet the majority of FOFs are more diversified than this. We find a new and surprising result that this excess diversification actually increases the left tail risk exposure of FOFs particularly once we account for the extent to which hedge fund returns are smoothed. Furthermore the average FOF in our sample is more exposed to left tail risk than are naïve 1/N randomly chosen portfolios. This increase in tail risk is accompanied by lower returns which we attribute to the cost of necessary due diligence which increases with the number of underlying hedge funds in the FOFs .
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: Funds of Hedge Funds, Diversification, Tail Risk Exposure, Hedge Funds
JEL Classification: G23, G11, C32
Date posted: July 22, 2009 ; Last revised: July 9, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.438 seconds