Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1437791
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (64)



 


 



Shareholder Activism in the Obama Era


Stephen M. Bainbridge


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

July 22, 2009

UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 09-14

Abstract:     
The financial crisis of 2008 and the ascendancy of the Democratic Party in Washington have created an environment in which proponents of expanded shareholder corporate governance rights are making considerable progress. Even before the crisis hit, of course, there had been a number of efforts to extend the shareholder franchise, principally so as to empower institutional investors. The crisis, however, has given them new momentum.

The logic behind the shareholder empowerment project is that institutional investors will behave quite differently than dispersed individual investors. Because they own large blocks, and have an incentive to develop specialized expertise in making and monitoring investments, institutional investors could play a far more active role in corporate governance than dispersed individual investors traditionally have done. Institutional investors holding large blocks thus have more power to hold management accountable for actions that do not promote shareholder welfare. Their greater access to firm information, coupled with their concentrated voting power, might enable them to more actively monitor the firm’s performance and to make changes in the board’s composition when performance lagged.

In fact, however, institutional investor activism is rare and limited primarily to union and state or local public employee pensions. As a result, institutional investor activism has not - and cannot - prove a panacea for the pathologies of corporate governance. Activist investors pursue agendas not shared by and often in conflict with those of passive investors. Activism by investors undermines the role of the board of directors as a central decision-making body, thereby making corporate governance less effective. Finally, relying on activist institutional investors will not solve the principal-agent problem inherent in corporate governance but rather will merely shift the locus of that problem.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: corporate governance, corporation law, shareholders, voting rights, institutional investors

JEL Classification: K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 23, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Bainbridge, Stephen M., Shareholder Activism in the Obama Era (July 22, 2009). UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 09-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1437791 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1437791

Contact Information

Stephen Mark Bainbridge (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1599 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.professorbainbridge.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,262
Downloads: 907
Download Rank: 13,064
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  64

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.360 seconds