Taxation, Pregnancy and Privacy
Bridget J. Crawford
Pace University School of Law
July 22, 2009
William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, Vol. 16, p. 327, 2010
This Article frames a discussion of surrogacy within the context of existing income tax laws. A surrogate receives money for carrying and bearing a child. This payment is income by any definition, even if the surrogacy contract recites that it is a “reimbursement.” Cases and rulings on the income tax consequences of the sale of blood and human breast-milk, as well as analogies to situations in which people are paid to wear advertising on their bodies, support the conclusion that a surrogate recognizes taxable income, although the IRS has never stated so. The Article considers, and then rebuts, privacy-based objections to a surrogacy tax. Disclosure of income from surrogacy is a reasonable consequence of the freedom to engage in that activity. For tax purposes, the reproductive labor of surrogacy is work. The federal government should take steps to increase tax compliance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: surrogacy, surrogate, surrogate motherhood, taxation, privacy, pregnancy, reproductive labor, women, blood, sperm, breast milk, income, privacy, tax enforcement, sales of body parts, organ donation
JEL Classification: K34, K39, K12Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 23, 2009 ; Last revised: August 27, 2010
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.360 seconds