Abstract

 


 



Why a Duck? Are Feminist Legal Journals an Endangered Species, and if so, are They Worth Saving?


Marjorie E. Kornhauser


Tulane University School of Law

2003

Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 12, p. 478, 2003

Abstract:     
This Essay is part of a symposium about whether feminist law journals have outlived their usefulness given that feminist legal scholarship is now published in mainstream law journals. It suggests that that these journals play a valuable role in scholarship for at least two reasons. First, feminist legal scholarship is still underrepresented in journals, especially top tier ones. Second, even if this type of scholarship were adequately represented, feminist journals like all specialty journals, serve a purpose. Criminal law journals, for example, provide a forum for experts in the field, allowing scholars to develop and explore issues more deeply than a general readership review can do. Similarly, feminist legal journals promote the development of feminist theory and practice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Legal scholarship, feminist, law review

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 23, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Kornhauser, Marjorie E., Why a Duck? Are Feminist Legal Journals an Endangered Species, and if so, are They Worth Saving? (2003). Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 12, p. 478, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1438153

Contact Information

Marjorie E. Kornhauser (Contact Author)
Tulane University School of Law ( email )
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 219
Downloads: 7

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.969 seconds