Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1438303
 
 

Footnotes (27)



 


 



Judges and Their Editors


Douglas E. Abrams


University of Missouri School of Law

March 16, 2010

Albany Government Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 392, 2010
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-18

Abstract:     
This essay discusses the roles of personal law clerks, central staff clerks, and Reporters of Decisions in editing judges’ opinions at the drafting stage. “The overarching lesson [is] that by submerging pride of authorship during an opinion’s gestation and by weighing editorial input with an open mind, judges secure in their craft advance the interests of justice.” The essay also discusses the constraints imposed by the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct on the circle of persons a judge may consult without giving the parties advance notice. The essay is adapted from Prof. Abrams’ address to the international meeting of the Association of Reporters of Judicial Decisions in Halifax, Nova Scotia on August 7, 2009.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: law clerks, central staff clerks, reporters of decisions, judge's opinions, judges

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 26, 2009 ; Last revised: March 17, 2010

Suggested Citation

Abrams, Douglas E., Judges and Their Editors (March 16, 2010). Albany Government Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 392, 2010; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1438303

Contact Information

Douglas E. Abrams (Contact Author)
University of Missouri School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
573-882-0307 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 659
Downloads: 23
Footnotes:  27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds