Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1438345
 
 

Footnotes (92)



 


 



Accidental Convergence: Corporate Reorganization in Two Federal Systems


Stephen J. Lubben


Seton Hall University - School of Law

July 25, 2009

Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2009

Abstract:     
The 2005 changes to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code represent the first significant step away from a long-term inclination toward corporate rescue. In doing so, Congress, however unwittingly, partially reunited American corporate bankruptcy practice with its long forgotten, much smaller twin, Switzerland. Why would Congress want to move the American system in this direction? To address this key question, I offer a comparison of corporate reorganization systems in these two leading commercial, federal systems. In particular, I examine the Swiss system for rescuing failed companies and compare it with the post-BACPA version of chapter 11. While the American system clearly remains more “debtor friendly,” the space between the two systems has significantly narrowed. More generally, through this short paper I demonstrate how Congress’ ill-conceived amendments to chapter 11 may have damaged a corporate reorganization system that is increasingly the subject of imitation worldwide.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Chapter 11, corporate reorganization, bankruptcy, Switzerland, BACPA, financial distress

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 25, 2009 ; Last revised: October 7, 2009

Suggested Citation

Lubben, Stephen J., Accidental Convergence: Corporate Reorganization in Two Federal Systems (July 25, 2009). Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1438345 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1438345

Contact Information

Stephen J. Lubben (Contact Author)
Seton Hall University - School of Law ( email )
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States
973-642-8857 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 933
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 164,528
Footnotes:  92
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds