|
||||
|
||||
The Law of Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Establishing Researchers' DutiesSusan M. WolfUniversity of Minnesota Law School Jordan ParadiseSeton Hall University - School of Law Charlisse Caga AnanCleveland Clinic Foundation - Department of Bioethics July 27, 2009 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 361-383, 2008 Abstract: Research technologies can now produce so much information that there is significant potential for incidental findings (IFs). hese are findings generated in research that are beyond the aims of the study. Current law and federal regulations offer no direct guidance on how to deal with IFs in research, nor is there adequate professional or institutional guidance. We advocate a defined set of researcher duties based on law and ethics and recommend a pathway to be followed in handling IFs in research. This article traces the underlying ethical and legal theories supporting researcher duties to manage IFs, including duties to develop a plan for management in the research protocol, to discuss the possibility of and management plan for IFs in the informed consent process, and to address, evaluate, and ultimately offer to disclose IFs of potential clinical or reproductive significance to research participants when they arise.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23 Keywords: incidental findings, genetics, research, informed consent, disclosure of results, law, ethics Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: June 30, 2010 ; Last revised: December 25, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.360 seconds