Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1439772
 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Accuracy Through the Use of Overtly Probabilistic Evidence and Methods


Jonathan J. Koehler


Northwestern University - School of Law

Daniel Shaviro


New York University School of Law

1990

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 247, 1990

Abstract:     
One cannot determine the merits of using base rate evidence and subjective probabilities without stipulating the underlying purposes in structuring trials. Yet commentators have not always distinguished clearly between verdict accuracy and what we will term 'policy concerns' (i.e., policies distinct from verdict accuracy that are implicated by trials). Instead, they often have let their views about one dictate their views about the other. Since the two are conceptually distinct, however, it is useful to consider separately the implications of probabilistic evidence for each in order to identify and evaluate the tradeoffs that may be involved. This Article will perform the first half of the necessary analysis by examining the effect of overtly probabilistic evidence and methods on verdict accuracy. We will show that overtly probabilistic evidence is no less probative of legally material facts than other types of evidence. We will suggest, moreover, that rules of probability theory such as Bayes' theorem can improve the accuracy with which juries evaluate evidence in particular cases, even when applied (where feasible) to subjective probabilities. Section I of this Article discusses the basic terms involved in a consideration of overtly probabilistic evidence. Section II considers the significance for verdict accuracy of using base rate evidence. Section III discusses the use of subjective probabilities. Section IV discusses problems with the use at trial of probabilistic evidence and methods. Section V provides a summary and conclusion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Base rate, probability, evidence

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 27, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Koehler, Jonathan J. and Shaviro, Daniel, Veridical Verdicts: Increasing Verdict Accuracy Through the Use of Overtly Probabilistic Evidence and Methods (1990). Cornell Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 247, 1990. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1439772

Contact Information

Jonathan J. Koehler (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Daniel Shaviro
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
Room 314-B
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6187 (Phone)
212-995-4341 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 416
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 188,465
Citations:  4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.391 seconds