Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440256
 
 

References (60)



 


 



Dodging Conflict: The Supreme Court Under Threat from Congress


Maeve P. Carey


George Washington University

July 28, 2009

CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
Although many scholars of judicial politics have looked for congressional constraint on the Supreme Court’s decisions, these studies have focused only on the Court’s decisions on the merits. In this paper, I change the terms of the debate from decisions on the merits to earlier decisions, arguing that if congressional constraint exists, it is more likely to be at preliminary stages. In an empirical study using data from the Burger Court, I find evidence that the Court takes congressional preferences into account when making these early decisions. Specifically, I look at the Supreme Court’s decision on whether to address the merits of a case once it has granted cert by examining its decision to rule on mootness, standing, or to dismiss the case entirely. My findings suggest that scholars may be looking in the wrong places for evidence of congressional constraint upon the Supreme Court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: supreme court, congress, congressional constraint, judicial-legislative relations

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 30, 2009 ; Last revised: November 5, 2009

Suggested Citation

Carey, Maeve P., Dodging Conflict: The Supreme Court Under Threat from Congress (July 28, 2009). CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440256 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1440256

Contact Information

Maeve P. Carey (Contact Author)
George Washington University ( email )
2121 I Street NW
Washington, DC 20052
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 95
Downloads: 9
References:  60

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds