Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440391
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



Complexifying Roncarelli’s Rule of Law


Robert Leckey


McGill University - Faculty of Law

November 30, 2009

McGill Law Journal, Vol. 55, pp. 721-41, 2010

Abstract:     
On its 50th anniversary, this paper argues for revising the accepted reading of Roncarelli v. Duplessis. Accounts by which Rand J. defended the rule of law while the dissenters were indifferent to it mischaracterize the judgment. Rand J.'s judgment is bolder and less explicit than is typically supposed: his treatment of the notice requirement constitutes part of his defence of the rule of law. Fauteux J.'s dissent enacts a plausible understanding of the judge's role within the rule of law. Disagreement on the overlooked procedural issue is best viewed as fully internal to the rule of law. The judgment's relevance for rule-of-law scholars is its exemplification of the possibility for rule-of-law impulses to conflict, making it a much richer and more interesting text. Scholars' dismissiveness towards the procedural issue reveals an unsatisfactory view on the part of legal scholars, one by which judges simply apply the rule of law, rather than being also themselves constrained by it. Their failure to recognize Rand J.’s treatment of the procedural rule as a key part of his performance suggests the need for rule-of-law scholars - reading as both philosophers and lawyers - to include the technicalities within the judicial conduct of interest to them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: rule of law, Roncarelli v. Duplessis, administrative law, constitutional law, legal scholarship, Dyzenhaus

JEL Classification: K10, K40, K41, K42, K49

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 31, 2009 ; Last revised: April 22, 2011

Suggested Citation

Leckey, Robert, Complexifying Roncarelli’s Rule of Law (November 30, 2009). McGill Law Journal, Vol. 55, pp. 721-41, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440391

Contact Information

Robert Leckey (Contact Author)
McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
514-398-4148 (Phone)
514-398-4659 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 809
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 119,674
Footnotes:  80

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.438 seconds