Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1441225
 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Fiduciaries with Conflicting Obligations


Steven L. Schwarcz


Duke University - School of Law

May 26, 2010

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 6, p. 1867, 2010

Abstract:     
This Article examines the dilemma of a fiduciary acting for parties who, as among themselves, have conflicting commercial interests - an inquiry fundamentally different from that of the traditional study of conflicts between fiduciaries and their beneficiaries. Existing legal principles do not fully capture this dilemma because agency law focuses primarily on an agent’s duty to a given principal, not on conflicts among principals; trust law focuses primarily on gratuitous transfers; and commercial law generally addresses arm’s length, not fiduciary, relationships. The dilemma has become critically important, however, as defaults increase in the multitude of conflicting securities (e.g., classes of securities of the same issuer having different priorities or sources of payment) that are typical of modern finance. A fiduciary, such as a trustee, acting for investors in these securities faces the difficult task of trying to understand and balance the respective obligations owed to conflicting classes and the risk of being sued no matter how the balancing is performed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: fiduciary conflicts, agency, securities, bankruptcy, CDO, SIV

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 1, 2009 ; Last revised: May 31, 2012

Suggested Citation

Schwarcz, Steven L., Fiduciaries with Conflicting Obligations (May 26, 2010). Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 6, p. 1867, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1441225

Contact Information

Steven L. Schwarcz (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7060 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,401
Downloads: 427
Download Rank: 37,576
Citations:  3
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds