|
||||
|
||||
A Framework for Financial Reporting Standards: Issues and a Suggested ModelRobert J. BloomfieldCornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management Theodore E. ChristensenBrigham Young University - Marriott School of Management Karim JamalUniversity of Alberta - Department of Accounting, Operations & Information Systems Stephen R. MoehrleUniversity of Missouri at Saint Louis - Accounting Area James A. OhlsonNew York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business; New York University (NYU) - Department of Accounting, Taxation & Business Law Stephen H. PenmanColumbia University - Department of Accounting Gary PrevitsCase Western Reserve University - Department of Accountancy Thomas L. StoberUniversity of Notre Dame - Department of Accountancy Shyam SunderYale University - School of Management Ross L. WattsMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management Robert H. ColsonGrant Thornton LLP July 30, 2009 Accounting Horizons, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2010 University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-678 Abstract: Standard setters and most academics maintain that accounting standards ought to rest on a set of guiding principles stated explicitly in a “conceptual framework.” The FASB and IASB are currently involved in a project to refine conceptual framework documents developed earlier. At this point, it is not clear what their final product will look like; its defining characteristics as well as the substantive content can only be surmised. This paper addresses the issues that FASB and IASB face, including the question of what a conceptual framework should be all about. First, we suggest characteristics that a conceptual framework ought to exhibit. Most of these suggestions are based on our critique of the existing framework and the FASB-IASB work in progress. Second, we present a model framework that meets our criteria. We emphasize up front that this framework is quite explicit. It goes to the heart of what a framework document should do: it places specific restrictions on what constitutes admissible accounting standards. The purpose of our effort is to stimulate broad discussion of alternative approaches to foundational documents and to offer a specific example of such an alternative approach.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26 Keywords: FASB, IASB, Conceptual Framework, Accounting Standards, Financial Reporting JEL Classification: M40, M41, M44 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 2, 2009 ; Last revised: June 10, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 1.297 seconds