Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1441962
 
 

Footnotes (184)



 


 



Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Sovereign Equality, Global Pluralism, and the Limits of International Criminal Justice


Brad R. Roth


Wayne State University Law School

July 31, 2009

Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Vol. 8, Forthcoming
Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 09-17

Abstract:     
Nullum crimen sine lege and related doctrines that limit extraterritorial jurisdiction and confer immunity ratione materiae are not inconvenient obstacles to be circumvented, but crucial safeguards to be respected. These doctrines respond to the reality that the international community remains beset by serious moral disagreement, both about what count as just ends and about which harsh measures those ends might justify in circumstances of high-stakes political conflict. In such a world, in which very few hands are truly clean, unilateral invocations of universal principles must be viewed skeptically, and associated exercises of power treated guardedly. Prosecutions undertaken in the name of the international community must establish a requisite social, and not merely a moral, basis for condemning acts - including acknowledged human rights violations - as crimes, and for holding their state-authorized perpetrators as subject to individual penal responsibility.

An over-assertive approach to international criminal justice, to be pursued unilaterally in domestic justice systems, is troubling because it risks undermining what is arguably most valuable about international law. International law provides a framework for accommodation among the non-like-minded, and a normative basis for mobilizing broad opposition to the self-righteous violence of the powerful (even as it licenses uses of force where there is genuinely no reasonable alternative). Penal processes aim to identify villains, consequently to exclude them as bearers of recognized authority, and thus as partners in negotiation and accommodation. Appropriate though such outcomes are in an important subset of circumstances, it is dangerous to distract from the deeper truth that peace means peace with others as they are, not as we might like for them to be. One must seek peace, not always with the gentle, but often with the ruthless. A repudiation of that truth risks setting in motion, willy-nilly, a new ruthlessness to end all ruthlessness.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Keywords: International criminal law, principle of legality, nullum crimen sine lege, sovereignty, immunity

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 31, 2009 ; Last revised: August 12, 2009

Suggested Citation

Roth, Brad R., Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Sovereign Equality, Global Pluralism, and the Limits of International Criminal Justice (July 31, 2009). Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Vol. 8, Forthcoming; Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 09-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1441962

Contact Information

Brad R. Roth (Contact Author)
Wayne State University Law School ( email )
471 West Palmer Ave.
Detroit, MI 48202
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,088
Downloads: 400
Download Rank: 42,076
Footnotes:  184

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds