Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1442118
 
 

References (90)



 


 



Predicting Lawyer Effectiveness: A New Assessment for Use in Law School Admission Decisions


Marjorie M. Shultz


Boalt Hall School of Law; University of California, Berkeley

Sheldon Zedeck


University California, Berkeley

July 31, 2009

CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
The problem of how to define merit and achieve equity in high stakes selection is deeply contested in the many arenas of our society where scarce resources and privileges are allocated. Law school admission is one such arena. The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) dominates current admission decisions for law school, but it assesses only a few competencies and has a large adverse impact on minority applicants. Moreover, the LSAT and its associated Index Score focus on law school performance and are not strongly predictive of lawyer performance.

Innovative exploratory research by two UC Berkeley faculty (Marjorie Shultz, Law and Sheldon Zedeck, Psychology) has demonstrated that on-the-job professional effectiveness of lawyers can be predicted. The new Shultz-Zedeck tests, developed based on models from employment selection and promotion and the field of industrial psychology, identify and assess many factors not measured by the LSAT that are vital to lawyer efficacy, such as problem solving, advocacy, practical judgment, and communication skills. Exploratory research conducted with participation of more than 5000 law grads suggests that tests can be developed and validated that will predict professional performance (as appraised by peers and supervisors). Equally important, performance on these new tests shows no significant race, ethnic or gender differences. This research has the potential to diversify the pool of students admitted to law schools and to do so on the basis of a principled definition of merit rather than on the basis of more politically and legally controversial methods of race-conscious affirmative action. The next step is a national validation study to ready this new approach to law school admission for adoption by the nation’s law schools.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 155

Keywords: law school, admissions, professional performance, diversity, merit

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 1, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Shultz, Marjorie M. and Zedeck, Sheldon, Predicting Lawyer Effectiveness: A New Assessment for Use in Law School Admission Decisions (July 31, 2009). CELS 2009 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1442118 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1442118

Contact Information

Marjorie M. Shultz (Contact Author)
Boalt Hall School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
University of California, Berkeley ( email )
United States
Sheldon Zedeck
University California, Berkeley ( email )
Berekeley, CA 94720
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,634
Downloads: 976
Download Rank: 12,023
References:  90

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds