Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443412
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Did TRIPS Spur Innovation? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Duration and Incentives to Innovate


David Abrams


University of Pennsylvania Law School

2009

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, P. 1613, 2009
University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-24

Abstract:     
How to structure IP laws in order to maximize social welfare by striking the right balance between incentives to innovate and access to innovation is an empirical question. It is a challenging one to answer, both because innovation is difficult to value and changes in IP protection are rare. The 1995 TRIPS agreement provides a unique opportunity to learn about this question for two reasons. First, the adoption of the agreement was uncertain until shortly before adoption, making it a plausibly exogenous change to patent duration. Second, the nature of the law change meant that the patent duration change was heterogeneous across patent classes. Using both patent counts and citation-weighted counts, I am able to take advantage of the TRIPS-induced law change to empirically estimate the impact of patent duration on innovation. I find evidence for an increase in innovation due to patent term extension following TRIPS. Both patent counts and citation-weighted counts increased more following TRIPS in those classes that received greater expected term extensions relative to classes receiving shorter extensions. While the precise calibration of innovation valuation is difficult, this paper provides the first attempt to empirically estimate its response to a major change to patent duration, from the TRIPS agreement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: intellectual property law, empirical legal research, patent law, science and technology, effect of patent duration on innovation, calibration of innovation valuation, elasticity of innovation

JEL Classification: K11, O31

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 7, 2009 ; Last revised: March 6, 2014

Suggested Citation

Abrams, David, Did TRIPS Spur Innovation? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Duration and Incentives to Innovate (2009). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, P. 1613, 2009; University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443412 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443412

Contact Information

David S. Abrams (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 749
Downloads: 227
Download Rank: 74,041
Citations:  1
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Intellectual Property
By Peter Menell and Suzanne Scotchmer

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.156 seconds