Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (9)



 


 



Public Perceptions of the Lower Federal Courts


Sara C. Benesh


University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

Amy Steigerwalt


Georgia State University

Nancy Scherer


Wellesley College - Political Science

August 3, 2009


Abstract:     
The lower federal courts decide cases every day that are essential to a democracy and yet, lower federal court judges are not accountable to the people nor are their decisions often reversed (or even reviewed) by the U.S. Supreme Court. Their decisions are not self-implementing. Hence, our confidence in these local federal courts -- to make the right decisions and to decide cases fairly -- is essential to upholding the rule of law. But, we know little about levels of confidence in these courts or knowledge about these courts. This article seeks to inform on both of those points via use of a national randomly generated survey.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: public opinion, lower federal courts, confidence, diffuse support, Supreme Court

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 8, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Benesh, Sara C., Steigerwalt, Amy and Scherer, Nancy, Public Perceptions of the Lower Federal Courts (August 3, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443434 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443434

Contact Information

Sara C. Benesh (Contact Author)
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee ( email )
Milwaukee, WI 53211
United States
Amy Steigerwalt
Georgia State University ( email )
38 Peachtree Center Ave
Suite 1005
Atlanta, GA 30302
United States
Nancy Scherer
Wellesley College - Political Science ( email )
Pendleton East 16
106 Central Street
Wellesley, MA 02481
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 272
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 186,691
Footnotes:  9

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.406 seconds