The Law of Standard Form Contracts: Misguided Intuitions and Suggestions for Reconstruction
Shmuel I. Becher
College of Management
Sapir Academic College
August 4, 2009
DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal
The law of standard form contracts rests on intuitions. This essay explores these intuitions and examines intended consumer behavior in common contracting contexts. The first study in this essay focuses on the intent of consumers to read form contracts in four different scenarios. The second examines the extent to which prevalent rational-economic factors influence potential consumers in their intent to read form contracts. Our findings support some of the common assumptions found in the literature and contradict others. The findings from the first questionnaire support the assumption that most consumers do not read most of the contracts in their entirety at the time of contracting. However, they do not support the assumption found in some literature that a substantial minority of consumers read their contracts and thus might discipline sellers. The results also show that many more consumers indicate a tendency to read contracts after the fact. The findings of the second questionnaire show that at the time of contracting, the most prevalent rational-economic reasons for reading the contact are cost, length of contract and the prospects of influencing or changing contract terms. Cost and the chance to influence or change contract terms are also detrimental factors in consumers' intention to read form contracts after the fact, as is the opportunity to learn new things about their rights and obligations under the contract. Quite surprisingly, however, legal jargon, print density and font size are not key factors in consumers' decisions on whether to read their contracts. All these findings can serve policy makers and courts in better designing the law that governs consumer form contracts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: consumer contracts, consumer contracting behavior
JEL Classification: K12, K3
Date posted: August 7, 2009 ; Last revised: April 7, 2010
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds