Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443970
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Make Congress Speak Clearly: Federal Preemption of State Tort Remedies


Betsy Grey


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

1997

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 77, p. 559, 1997

Abstract:     
This Article argues that when such statutory ambiguity exists, courts should be extremely wary of finding congressional intent to preempt. The relative judicial willingness-reflected in Cipollone-to find preemption, even when Congress has not made its intent unmistakably clear, threatens to erode bedrock principles of federalism. Historically, clear statement rules have been applied to legislation that threatened to alter the constitutional balance inherent in our system of federalism. Applying these interpretive rules to preemption, courts should exercise extreme caution before disrupting important state interests that the states have spent many years developing though the common law. Few values are more central to federalism than the right of states to provide a compensatory remedy for their injured citizens.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: Compensation, preemption, remedies

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 5, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Grey, Betsy, Make Congress Speak Clearly: Federal Preemption of State Tort Remedies (1997). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 77, p. 559, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1443970

Contact Information

Betsy Grey (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 506
Downloads: 17
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds