Limit to Improvement: Myth or Reality? Empirical Analysis of Historical Improvement on Three Technologies Influential in the Evolution of Civilization
Techonological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 77, Issue 5, pp. 712-729, 2010
KDI School of Public Policy & Management Paper Series No. 09-06
42 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 31 Jan 2018
Date Written: July 1, 2009
Abstract
The evolution of civilization appears to have primarily resulted from continuous improvement made possible by technological advances. A group of social evolutionists and economists have identified, among others, energy, transport, as well as information and communication to be the three most influential technologies. On the other hand, a number of eminent scholars have cited several forces, natural, physiological, technological, as well as environmental which can place a limit on on-going improvement.
The purpose of this paper is to empirically explore the continuous improvement process as well as the limit placed on these three technologies. Using the framework of both connected and disconnected multiple technology S-curves and X-factor, historical improvement data on these three elements have been analyzed. The results of our analysis indicate that improvement in general has continued without limit mainly due to a series of emerging new technologies. These emerging technologies can be either connected or disconnected from the existing mature technologies. Our preliminary analysis shows that much of the past improvement comes from new technologies that on first serious application appear to be substantially superior from earlier technologies. In addition, enormous continuous improvement, which has accompanied both connected and disconnected new technologies appear to have played the critical role in sustaining the evolution of civilization. The paper discusses a number of policy implications and suggests topics for future research.
Keywords: Technology S-Curve, X-Factor Analysis, Continuous Improvement, Disconnected Technology, Performance Difference, Lighting, Transport, Information and Communication
JEL Classification: O11, O32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Competition and Productivity in Japanese Manufacturing Industries
By Yosuke Okada
-
Competition and Innovation: The Inverted-U Relationship Revisited
-
Competition and Innovation: The Inverted-U Relationship Revisited
-
Competition & Innovation: New Evidence from US Patent and Productivity Data
By Juan A. Correa and Carmine Ornaghi
-
Industrial Concentration, Price-Cost Margins, and Innovation
By David Flath
-
Are There Any Cournot Industries?
By David Flath
-
By Michele Boldrin, Juan Allamand, ...