|
||||
|
||||
Qualified Intermediary or Bust?Susan C. MorseUniversity of California Hastings College of the Law August 3, 2009 Tax Notes, Vol. 124, No. 5, 2009 Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009 Abstract: In reaction to news about wealthy U.S. individuals hiding assets in non-U.S. bank accounts, the Obama administration has proposed statutes that would make non-qualified intermediary (NQI) status more unattractive for non-U.S. banks. The proposals appear to push non-U.S. banks into qualified intermediary (QI) agreements with the IRS, and under accompanying proposals QIs would undertake expanded responsibilities to automatically provide information about U.S. clients to the IRS. But models other than the QI system could also serve the enforcement goal of international automatic information exchange. Fortunately, the proposals also would permit Treasury and the IRS to craft administrative exceptions to adverse NQI rules. Officials could use this discretion to support the development of effective automatic information exchange agreements and systems whether or not they followed the QI template.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 4 Keywords: qualified intermediary, international information exchange, residence taxation JEL Classification: H20, H24, K34 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 10, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.625 seconds