Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445451
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (7)



 


 



A Note on the Dewey-Lippmann Debate


Colin D. Pearce


Clemson University - College of Business and Behavioral Science

August 7, 2009


Abstract:     
This short paper gives a quick overview of the debate between John Dewey and Walter Lippmann over the relationship of good government to Democracy. Lippmann adopts an "elitist" or "Platonic" stance arguing that above all mass democracy needs the educated guidance of a specially trained few while Dewey takes the view that a "dialectic" is possible between the average citizen and the educated "experts" such that a role for Lippmann's "Philosopher-Expert Kings" would be superfluous. Behind this differnce on the nature of democratic government there is a further opposition between the two men over whether a successful politics requires the Absolute, or the Transcendent as a necessary foundation for its its self-understanding or whether poliitcs is essentially a "piecemeal" process taking its direction from the developments and adaptations amongst the people that of necessity take place in an advanced society.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: Pragmatism, Dewey, Lippmann, Rorty, Democracy, Metaphysics

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 9, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Pearce, Colin D., A Note on the Dewey-Lippmann Debate (August 7, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445451 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1445451

Contact Information

Colin D. Pearce (Contact Author)
Clemson University - College of Business and Behavioral Science ( email )
Clemson, SC 29631
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 496
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 160,483
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds