Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445583
 
 

Footnotes (472)



 


 



Retirees at Risk: The Precarious Promise of Post-Employment Health Benefits


Richard L. Kaplan


University of Illinois College of Law

Nicholas J. Powers


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Jordan Zucker


DLA Piper US LLP, Chicago

June 1, 2009

Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2009
U Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE09-021
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 09-04

Abstract:     
This article examines the increasingly troubled state of employer-provided health benefits for retirees. The availability of such benefits is a major determinant of both the timing of retirement and the financial security of those who retire. Despite the signal importance of these benefits to current and prospective retirees, employers have been steadily eroding their value and in many cases, eliminating these benefits outright. Such actions are often catastrophic for the retirees affected, especially if they are not yet eligible for Medicare.

This article begins by explaining the economic pressures that have precipitated this unfortunate development, including the increasing cost of health care generally. But much of the decline in retiree health benefits is attributable to financial accounting requirements that required employers to disclose the projected costs of these benefits. These accounting requirements have recently been extended to state and local government employers, and another wave of broken promises may lie just ahead.

The article next examines the extensive litigation regarding the erosion and/or termination of retiree health benefits, focusing on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Claims that retirees have 'vested' rights to such benefits are analyzed in both the unionized and nonunionized employment contexts, as well as claims of breach of fiduciary duty and estoppel. In short, ERISA has largely failed to protect the reasonable expectations of retirees concerning their post-employment health benefits.

The article then turns to alternative approaches that retirees might consider, including continuation coverage from their former employer, individually obtained health insurance, and health savings accounts. Finding serious problems with each of these approaches, the article considers recent legislative proposals to extend Medicare to early retirees, noting the impact of such an extension on existing employer health benefit programs for retirees and on individuals’ retirement timing decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 7, 2009 ; Last revised: September 1, 2009

Suggested Citation

Kaplan, Richard L. and Powers, Nicholas J. and Zucker, Jordan, Retirees at Risk: The Precarious Promise of Post-Employment Health Benefits (June 1, 2009). Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2009; U Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE09-021; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 09-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1445583

Contact Information

Richard L. Kaplan (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
(217) 333-2499 (Phone)
(217) 244-1478 (Fax)

Nicholas J. Powers
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Jordan Zucker
DLA Piper US LLP, Chicago ( email )
Chicago, IL
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,236
Downloads: 630
Download Rank: 22,557
Footnotes:  472

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds