Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1446008
 
 

Footnotes (118)



 


 



Settling IDEA Cases: Making Up is Hard to Do


Mark C. Weber


DePaul University College of Law

September 9, 2009

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 43, p. 641, 2010

Abstract:     
Like most other legal disputes, most cases brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) settle. But although IDEA, the federal law governing special education, was enacted a generation ago, litigants still lack guidance how the mechanisms of settlement should work, what the settlement agreement should look like, and what to do if one side of the dispute fails to live up to its agreement. Settling an IDEA case entails unique issues - and unique pitfalls - that make the topic even more challenging than the settlement of other cases. IDEA has a mediation provision with extensive requirements and a one-of-a-kind prehearing settlement device termed the 'resolution session.' Special education settlement agreements may be vulnerable to attack on the ground that they undermine the purpose of IDEA. Jurisdiction under IDEA for actions to enforce settlements is uncertain, and exhaustion defenses may bar the actions. There is an administrative offer-of-settlement provision whose interpretation is open to debate, and parents who prevail in special education disputes have an entitlement to attorneys’ fees that may, or may not, apply when a case is settled.

This Article provides a comprehensive description of the law of settlement of IDEA disputes. It delves into mediation and dispute resolution, discussing what can be mediated and how. It notes the courts’ general practice of enforcing settlement agreements as written, despite arguments that departures from settlement terms are justified. It marshals the arguments and caselaw regarding jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreements and the administrative exhaustion defense. It describes the offer-of-settlement rule and discusses its interaction with the attorneys’ fees provision. It considers attorneys’ fees for settlements, discussing the circumstances under which fees might be available to parents in IDEA settlements. Although this Article is intended primarily to be descriptive, it concludes with an evaluation that advances some steps for reforming the law of IDEA case settlement: a clarification of federal jurisdiction, a bypassing of exhaustion for civil actions enforcing settlements, and greater legislative guidance as to what forms of settlement may support fees.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: education, special education, disability, civil rights

JEL Classification: I20, I28, J71

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 8, 2009 ; Last revised: August 4, 2010

Suggested Citation

Weber, Mark C., Settling IDEA Cases: Making Up is Hard to Do (September 9, 2009). Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 43, p. 641, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1446008

Contact Information

Mark C. Weber (Contact Author)
DePaul University College of Law ( email )
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL Cook County 60604-2287
United States
312-362-8808 (Phone)
312-362-5448 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 832
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 95,587
Footnotes:  118

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds