|
||||
|
||||
How Certain is the Uncertainty Effect?Ondrej RydvalCharles University in Prague - CERGE-EI (Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute); Max Planck Institute of Economics Andreas OrtmannAustralian School of Business, UNSW Sasha ProkoshevaCharles University in Prague - CERGE-EI (Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute) Ralph HertwigMax Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Human Development July 1, 2009 CERGE-EI Working Paper no. 385 Abstract: We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so-called uncertainty effect, namely, that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery’s worse outcome. While the authors implemented a verbal lottery description, we use a physical lottery format which makes misinterpretation of the lottery structure highly unlikely. We also provide subjects with complete information about the goods they are to value (book gift certificates and one-year deferred payments). Contrary to Gneezy et al. (2006), we observe for all three pricing tasks that subjects’ willingness to pay for the lottery is significantly higher than other subjects’ willingness to pay for the lottery’s worse outcome.
Note: Downloadable document is in Czech. Number of Pages in PDF File: 41 Keywords: Decision under risk, framing, experiments, task ambiguity JEL Classification: C81, C91, C93, D83 working papers seriesDate posted: August 12, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.734 seconds