Assessing RLUIPA's Application to Building Codes and Aesthetic Land Use Regulation
Shelley Ross Saxer
Pepperdine University School of Law
August 11, 2009
Albany Government Law Review, Vol. 2, 2009
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009/17
This article presents the author’s argument that building codes and aesthetic or historical land use regulations should be subject to scrutiny under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). This scrutiny would serve to further the intent of RLUIPA to protect the religious exercise of churches and synagogues against government discrimination in zoning codes and land use regulation, both for established and non-established religious denominations. This scrutiny also ensures that RLUIPA is construed broadly, as was Congress’s intent, to maximize federal constitutional protection of the free exercise of religion. Judicial application of RLUIPA has been varied: while some courts have applied RLUIPA to any local land use regulation impacting religious exercise, others have applied RLUIPA only if there appears to be actual discrimination occurring in the land use regulations scheme. Building codes, as well as aesthetic and historical regulations, are generally designed to ensure that buildings are safe, habitable and appropriate for the community environment, and they may be facially neutral. However, the author argues that they should be closely scrutinized under constitutional principles or RLUIPA guidelines when they are individually applied to burden the fundamental right of free exercise of religion, because arbitrary or discriminatory decision-making cannot be allowed to hide behind the facial neutrality of these codes and regulations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: religion, religious, land use, building codes, RLUIPA, free exercise, constitution, religious exercise, discrimination, land use regulations, scrutiny, discrimination, religious discrimination, neutralityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 11, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds