Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1447887
 
 

Footnotes (265)



 


 



Law, Politics, and the Conception of the State in State Recognition Theory


William Thomas Worster


The Hague University - International Law

August 12, 2009

Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2009

Abstract:     
The competing theories of state recognition and their failings actively demonstrate that recognition of a state does not have any normative content per se, but rather, that the rules of state recognition, although legal rules, are legal vehicles for political choices. We have the dilemma of concurrently wanting the right cases to result in independent states while prohibiting the wrong ones from becoming so, and so we sail between political choices, using the language of law. The state is neither truly free to recognize another entity nor entirely bound. Differing cases require different legal criteria and different legal results. This flexibility in state recognition theory though, while depriving the act of any inherent legal meaning, has value in its utility for establishing lawful relationships.

This paper will argue that the reason we find it difficult to resolve the controversy over state recognition theory is because the international legal system translates political controversies into legal questions that can then be addressed through legal means. Legal actors, by announcing preference for one side of the question, often reveal certain legal and moral choices they are making about the nature of the state and the legitimacy of the international legal system - law and politics. In the area of state recognition, no theory of recognition has extinguished competition because no political choice has gained universal acceptance. The predominant political choice is most frequently deliberate indeterminacy, a co-existence of mutually opposing arguments. This indeterminacy is most likely deliberate because it permits the underlying rationale for the legal actor’s policies to change and evolve to suit the situation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: state, statehood, recognition, constitutive, declaratory, law, politics, independent, independence, normative, legal, system, Kosovo, Yugoslavia, Montenegro, Abkhazia, South Ossetia

JEL Classification: K33, K39, K40, K49, K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Worster, William Thomas, Law, Politics, and the Conception of the State in State Recognition Theory (August 12, 2009). Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1447887

Contact Information

William Thomas Worster (Contact Author)
The Hague University - International Law ( email )
Stamkartplein 40
Hague
Netherlands
HOME PAGE: http://www.hhs.nl
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,051
Downloads: 478
Download Rank: 32,124
Footnotes:  265

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds