|
||||
|
||||
Law(Makers) of the Land: The Doctrine of Treaty Non-Self-Execution
David H. Moore J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young Uniiversity Harvard Law Review, Vol. 122, p. 32, 2009 Abstract: This essay responds to Carlos Manuel Vázquez, Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and the Judicial Enforcement of Treaties, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 599 (2008). Focusing on the authority of the lawmakers of the land, rather than on treaties’ status as law of the land as Professor Vázquez does, this essay concludes that the Foster brand of nonself-execution (which assumes that a treaty may, in the absence of a clear statament, indicate that the treaty is domestically unenforceable) is supported by the Constitution, consistent with longstanding precedent, a coherent part of the non-self-execution doctrine, and endorsed by the Supreme Court's decision in Medellín v. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008).
Keywords: treaty, self-execution, medellin, foreign relations law, medellin, vazquez, foster Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 15, 2009 ; Last revised: August 15, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo 6 in 0.110 seconds.