|
||||
|
||||
Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of AnonymizationPaul OhmUniversity of Colorado Law School August 13, 2009 UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 1701, 2010 U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 9-12 Abstract: Computer scientists have recently undermined our faith in the privacy-protecting power of anonymization, the name for techniques for protecting the privacy of individuals in large databases by deleting information like names and social security numbers. These scientists have demonstrated they can often 'reidentify' or 'deanonymize' individuals hidden in anonymized data with astonishing ease. By understanding this research, we will realize we have made a mistake, labored beneath a fundamental misunderstanding, which has assured us much less privacy than we have assumed. This mistake pervades nearly every information privacy law, regulation, and debate, yet regulators and legal scholars have paid it scant attention. We must respond to the surprising failure of anonymization, and this Article provides the tools to do so.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 77 Keywords: privacy, information privacy, anonymization, reidentification, deidentification, HIPAA, Data Protection Directive JEL Classification: K1, K1, K13, K2, K23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 13, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.437 seconds