Expertise and the Ideological Consequences of the Authoritarian Predisposition
Christopher M Federico
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Psychology; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Political Science
Emily L Fisher
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Grace M. Deason
University of Wisconsin - La Crosse
APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper
Recent research on the psychological bases of political ideology suggests that a number of “pre-political” variables influence individuals‟ ideological positions. This paper examines how the political implications of one such variable – the authoritarian predisposition – may be conditioned by citizens‟ political expertise. An examination of the 2000 and 2004 American National Election Studies revealed that (1) the relation between the authoritarian predisposition and conservatism was stronger among experts; (2) relations between the authoritarian predisposition and the two component facets of conservatism – opposition to equality and support for traditionalism – were also stronger among experts; and (3) the interactive effect of expertise and the authoritarian predisposition on conservatism was mediated by orientations toward equality and traditionalism. These findings suggest that the linkage between psychological variables and ideology may be contingent on one‟s understanding of abstract political ideas and indicate the need for a more nuanced understanding of what expertise contributes to democratic citizenship.
Keywords: authoritarianism, ideology, political expertiseworking papers series
Date posted: August 13, 2009 ; Last revised: August 21, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.625 seconds