|
||||
|
||||
Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological ProgressTed O'DonoghueCornell University - Department of Economics Suzanne ScotchmerUniversity of California - Department of Economics ; School of Law, University of California, Berkeley; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Jacques-François ThisseCatholic University of Louvain (UCL) - Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1998 Abstract: In active investment climates where firms sequentially improve each other's products, a patent can terminate either because it expires or because a noninfringing innovation displaces its product in the market. We define the length of time until one of these happens as the effective patent life, and show how it depends on patent breadth. We distinguish "lagging" breadth, which protects against imitation, from "leading" breadth, which protects against new improved products. We compare two types of patent policy with leading breadth: (i) patents are finite but very broad, so that the effective life of a patent coincides with its statutory life, and (ii) patents are long but narrow, so that the effective life of a patent ends when a better product replaces it. The former policy improves the diffusion of new products, but the latter has lower R&D costs.
JEL Classification: O31 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 27, 1999Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.797 seconds