Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1452744
 
 

References (34)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Legal Origins, Civil Procedure, and the Quality of Contract Enforcement


Holger Spamann


Harvard Law School

February 12, 2010

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 166, No. 1, pp. 149-165, 2010
Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-51

Abstract:     
This paper empirically compares civil procedure in common law and civil law countries. Using World-Bank and hand-collected data, and unlike earlier studies that used predecessor data sets, this paper finds no systematic differences between common and civil law countries in the complexity, formalism, duration, or cost of procedure in courts of first instance. The paper further finds that by a subjective measure, contract enforceability in common law countries is higher than in French, but lower than in German and Scandinavian, civil law countries. Given civil procedure's central role for the common/civil law distinction, these findings challenge the distinction's economic relevance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: Legal origins, civil procedure, courts, comparative law, comparative institutions, formalism index

JEL Classification: K40, K41, P51

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2009 ; Last revised: February 15, 2010

Suggested Citation

Spamann, Holger, Legal Origins, Civil Procedure, and the Quality of Contract Enforcement (February 12, 2010). Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 166, No. 1, pp. 149-165, 2010; Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-51. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1452744

Contact Information

Holger Spamann (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,857
Downloads: 431
Download Rank: 36,630
References:  34
Citations:  3
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Large Sample, Quantitative Research Designs for Comparative Law?
By Holger Spamann

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds