Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1452877
 
 

Footnotes (200)



 


 



The Modernizing Mission of Judicial Review


David A. Strauss


University of Chicago Law School

August 14, 2009

University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 271

Abstract:     
Constitutional interpretation usually looks to the past--to an old text, to history, to precedent, to tradition — in an effort to limit political majorities. But recently, the Supreme Court has taken a different approach to the Constitution: It has tried to anticipate trends in public opinion instead of taking lessons from the past; and, at the same time, instead of facing down popular majorities, the Court has been prepared to give way if it learns that it has misgauged public opinion. This approach — which might be called modernization — has characterized the Supreme Court’s recent work in several areas, including the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment and the limits on sex discrimination imposed by the Equal Protection Clause. Perhaps most interesting, the substantive due process decisions of the last 40 years are modernizing decisions, unlike the pre-New Deal substantive due process decisions to which they are often, mistakenly, compared. Modernization is an appealing approach in many ways. Among other things, it holds out the hope of more easily reconciling judicial review with democracy. But modernization also raises serious questions--particularly that the courts may distort the political process and may be too willing to accommodate what they perceive as the demands of popular opinion, at the expense of a principled judicial role.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: constitutional law, modernization, Supreme Court, sex discrimination, substantive due process, Eighth Amendment

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 16, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Strauss, David A., The Modernizing Mission of Judicial Review (August 14, 2009). University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 271. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1452877 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1452877

Contact Information

David A. Strauss (Contact Author)
University of Chicago Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-702-9601 (Phone)
773-702-0356 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,227
Downloads: 259
Download Rank: 66,991
Footnotes:  200

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds