|
||||
|
||||
Transgender Identity, Textualism, and the Supreme Court: What is the 'Plain Meaning' of 'Sex' in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?Jillian T. WeissRamapo College July 31, 2009 Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 573, 2009 Abstract: Federal courts are split on the question of whether Title VII applies to transgender employees. This article traces the history of changes in the meaning of the word “sex”, arguing that textualist judges, including those on the Supreme Court, should find that sex includes transgender identity. The article reviews the historical changes in the meaning of the terms "transgender" and "sex." It argues that the meaning of "sex" has come to include "gender identity." It also suggests that the judicial philosophy of "textualism" requires Title VII protection under the rubric of "sex discrimination" for a transgender employee.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 77 Keywords: transgender, Civil Rights Act, Title VII, textualist, textualism, Supreme Court, sex, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, LGBT, GLBT, gay, lesbian, transsexual Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 15, 2009 ; Last revised: July 27, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds