Wikipedia’s Labor Squeeze and its Consequences
Santa Clara University - School of Law
August 19, 2009
Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 8
This Essay explains why Wikipedia will not be able to maintain a credible website while simultaneously letting anyone freely edit it. To date, Wikipedia editors have successfully defended against malicious attacks from spammers and vandals, but as editors turn over, Wikipedia will need to recruit replacements. However, Wikipedia will have difficulty with this recruiting task due to its limited incentives for participation. Faced with a potential labor squeeze, Wikipedia will choose to restrict users’ ability to contribute to the site as a way of preserving site credibility. Wikipedia’s specific configuration choices make it an interesting test case to evaluate the tension between free editability and site credibility, and this Essay touches on how this tension affects user-generated content (UGC) generally.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: Wikipedia, user-generated content, UGC, Web 2.0, peer production, wiki, online, volunteer
JEL Classification: J20, J41, L15, L86, M50
Date posted: August 20, 2009 ; Last revised: February 28, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.484 seconds