SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 



Breaching a Leaking Dam?: Corporate Money and Elections

Lloyd H. Mayer
Notre Dame Law School



Charleston Law Review (Supreme Court Preview edition), Vol. 4
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-36

Abstract:     
With a brief order issued at the end of its last term, the Supreme Court dramatically raised the stakes in Citizens United v. FEC. What many had predicted would be a case decided on narrow, technical grounds has now become a possible vehicle for overturning two key campaign finance precedents. By ordering re-argument and supplemental briefing on the issue of whether it should overrule either or both Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and the part of McConnell v. FEC which addresses the facial validity of Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, the Court signaled that it was considering breaching the already leaking dam that keeps corporate (and union) funds at least partially out of federal elections.

The first part of this Article places the Citizens United case in context by reviewing the almost 100 years of gradually tightening federal election laws governing the use of corporate funds, including the Court’s decision in Austin that upheld a state election law ban on corporations making certain election-related expenditures. The second part reviews the specific facts and issues raised in Citizens United. The third part then addresses how the Court is likely to answer the new question it has posed. That part concludes that given the stated and likely positions of the current nine Justices, the argument that is most likely to convince a majority of the Court not to overturn Austin is the doctrine of stare decisis, although that result is far from assured. Even stare decisis is unlikely to preserve the relevant portion of McConnell, however. The fourth and final part addresses the potential ramifications if the Court overrules either or both of the precedents it cited, including the new pressure an overruling of Austin would place on seemingly unrelated federal tax laws governing tax-exempt, nonprofit corporations.

Keywords: campaign finance, election law, BCRA, Citizens United v. FEC, WRTL v. FEC, Buckley v. Valeo

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: August 24, 2009 ; Last revised: September 18, 2009

Suggested Citation

Mayer, Lloyd H., Breaching a Leaking Dam?: Corporate Money and Elections (2009). Charleston Law Review (Supreme Court Preview edition), Vol. 4; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 09-36. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1458972


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Lloyd H. Mayer (Contact Author)
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
574-631-8057 (Phone)
574-631-4197 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nd.edu/~ndlaw/faculty/facultypages/mayer.html
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 407
Downloads: 91
Download Rank: 91,423

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 4 in 0.235 seconds.