Information Interpretation or Information Discovery: Which Role of Analysts Do Investors Value More?
New York University
University of Texas at Dallas
This study provides evidence that a significant percentage of analyst forecast revisions are issued promptly after a broad set of corporate public disclosures and that investors perceive these prompt revisions as more valuable than non-prompt revisions. These results hold for all revisions, non-earnings announcement triggered revisions, or revisions in weeks preceding earnings announcements, and are also robust to various sensitivity tests. Investors particularly value analysts’ prompt interpretation of earnings announcements or 8-K filings. To the extent that prompt revisions are more likely to reflect analysts’ information interpretation role, our results suggest that investors value more highly analysts’ ability to interpret public disclosure, especially less structured or non-financial disclosures. Unlike Ivkovic and Jegadeesh (2004) and Chen et al. (2010) which reach the opposite conclusion, we analyze analysts’ interpretation role with respect to a broader range of significant corporate disclosures than earnings announcements alone. We also provide evidence that analyst revisions made on the day of preliminary earnings announcements or the next day are significantly associated with excess returns, even after controlling for earnings and revenue surprises and accruals available in the announcements.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
JEL Classification: G34
Date posted: August 23, 2009 ; Last revised: September 6, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds